Sri Muthuswami Dikshitar  - Update of Jan'2004

[
Extract from an article by Prof.K.R.Rajagopalan that appeared in the Sangeet Natak Academy Journal]

Modern methods of using entropy to analyze Carnatic Music have already been used.The number of times each note occurs in a song is counted and then they are converted to proportions called P's.The entropy called H is calculated by the formula H = - ( p, ld p)
ld - logarithm to base 2.For example in the three songs the following are the proportions of notes from higher panchama (HP) to lower panchama.

Song1 - nAgalingam - Shankarabharanam
Song2 - sadAshivam upAsmahe - Shankarabharanam
Song3 - dharmasamvardhani - madhyamavati

Note    Song 1 Song2 Song3
HP .000 .001 .000
HM .005 .003 .009
HG .022 .002 -
HR .052 .058 .063
HS .117 .143 .152
N .014 .197 .122
D .113 .146 -
P .194 .104 .213
M .133 .041 .155
G .132 .047 -
R .060 .011 .154
S .072 .022 .103
LN .020 - .022
LD .044 - -
LP .002 - .006
LM - - -
H-Value 3.301    

If all the swaras have the same proportion of occurence ie maximum variation (at any stage one cannot say what the next swara would be as is the case with tosses of a coin or a roll of dice) then the values of H would be a maximum.Thus by comparing values of H for various songs one can find whether there is larger degree of freedom in the exploitation of the swaras than in the other songs.In the above table the notes in different octaves have been treated as being different.Since it is said that the swara is the same whatever the octave the next table would present calculations of H based on 7 swaras only for a number of compositions of the trinity in Kalyani and Shankarabharanam.

Shankarabharanam:

Dikshitar:

Nagalingam 2.756
sadasivam upAsmahe 2.756
shri kamalambikaya 2.753
akshaya linga vibho 2.751
sundareshwarAya 2.750
dakshiNAmUrte 2.724
shankarAcaryam 2.721
gurumUrte 2.636

Tyagaraja:

seetapati 2.773
eevaragu 2.767
ramaninuvina 2.763
shri raghuvara 2.762
prananatha 2.756
ramaramana 2.754
gatamoha 2.754
sambho siva 2.748
emineramu 2.744
endukeescala 2.746
bhakti bicca 2.740
sarasanetra 2.738
evidamulaina 2.738
seetakalyana 2.734
varasikhivahana 2.728
ramasitarama 2.725
valagadana 2.725
varaleelagana 2.724
mariyada 2.722
pahirama 2.712
paripalaya 2.711
swararaga 2.699
buddhiradu 2.696
manasusvAdinamaina 2.692
etudanila 2.685
vishnuvahanudu 2.679
enduku peddala 2.659
ehi trijagadisha 2.656
sundareswaruni 2.639

Shyama Shastri:

nannu karuninchu 2.754
devi meenanetri 2.711
sarojadala netri 2.662

Kalyani:

Dikshitar:

Shri mangalambike 2.767
abhayamba 2.757
kamakshIm 2.756
bhajare re 2.754
kamalambam 2.732
sivakameshwarIm 2.708

Tyagaraja:

bhajana seyave 2.783
Isa pahi 2.778

Considering both ragas have all seven swaras they have a maximum H value of 2.80764.It is seen for all composers generally H values for Kalyani are higher than the ones in shankarabharanam.It would also be noted that the songs found toward the end of the list are more in vogue than those found toward the beginning of the list.Could we take this to indicate that easier pieces would have generally low H values?


Home