|
Following the controversial
decision by Penwith Council to refuse the original request by
the people of Hayle for a local referendum on the future of the
old Hawkins Motors site in Hayle, another public meeting has
been called. The
decision by Penwith District Council to raise objections to the
referendum question put forward at the original meeting on the
grounds that it actually asked Penwith to do something and
because council officers thought the question was 'a leading
question' seems dubious in the extreme given the wide range of
questions which have been accepted for a local referendum in
other places. Some examples of questions which have successfully
been put to a local Parish/Town referendum are listed opposite.
While it would in theory
be possible to challenge Penwiths decision it was felt that this
would only be playing into their hands and would result in the
referendum being delayed even further. It has been decided
therefore with some reluctance that the best course of action is
to hold another public meeting at which the issue of a public
referendum on the future of the Old Hawkins site will be fully
discussed again.
The new meeting is
scheduled to take place at the same venue as the previous
meeting ie. on the top floor of the
Passmore
Edwards Institute
in
Commercial Road,
Hayle
The date has been set for
Wednesday September
14th
and will start at
7:30pm
The official notice of
the meeting as required by law and signed by at least six
persons on the electoral register will be posted shortly.
Please make every effort
to attend.
STOP PRESS:
It has recently been announced that the planning meeting at
which the Hawkins Garage development proposal will be decided
has been deferred until October 4th so there is no reason why
the referendum cannot take place prior to a decision being made!
STOP STOP PRESS:
Penwith have
reneged on their press statement to 'do all they can to assist
in the referendum' and have now announced that they will not
send a representative to the public meeting as promised.

|
These local
referenda questions have all been accepted and put to a parish
vote which seems to put Penwith in a minority of one!
Stour
and Orwell (Suffolk)
Do you oppose the development of a deep sea container port at
Bathside Bay?
Sherbern (Selby Nr York)
Do you want 1100 houses to be built in Sherburn in Elmet in
accordance with the deposit Selby District Local Plan?
Herringswell
(Newmarket)
Do you agree to the new town
development being promoted in Forest Heath?
East
Grinstead (West Sussex)
Do you want 2,500+ houses
built at East Grinstead?
Epping
Forest
Do you want to keep the pound sterling as the currency of the
United Kingdom?
Fulford (York)
Should the Council retain the Social Hall on School Lane and
carry out the repairs recommended by the Lawrence, Hannah &
Skelton report?
Allendale (Northumberland)
Do you agree that the land commonly known as The Cloffocks
should remain free of all retail development and be used solely
for recreational purposes?
Portsmouth
Are you in favour of the Southsea Town Council continuing in
existence?
Amersham
(Bucks)
Are you in favour of a
separate parish council to be formed for the ward of Little
Chalfont?
Aldborough
(Yorkshire)
GM crops should not be grown
in the parish of Aldborough until they are proven safe?
Bidford-on-Avon
(Warwickshire)
The residents of the Parish
of Bidford-on-Avon wish to keep its natural environs rural in
character. To this end, we ask that any proposal involving the
extraction of sand and gravel be opposed.. Do you support the
above proposal?
Ruddington (Notts)
Do you agree that the
Council replaces the Pavilion and Village Hall with a single new
building at Elms Park?
Kibworth Harcourt
(Leicestershire)
In view of the forecast
shortfall of only 33 houses within the Central Leicestershire
policy Area (CLPA), There is no valid requirement to release
land for 440 Houses off Warwick Road, Kibworth (KB/1) for
development at this time nor in the remaining life of the
current Local Plan
Droitwich
(Worcestershire)
1. Do you wish to see your
sea-bathing lido restored to its former splendour and fully
operational?
2. If the lido could only be
kept operational with a subsidy from our council tax, would you
be prepared for up to an average of £1.00 to be added to the
monthly tax instalment of each Droitwich household?
3. Do you oppose Wychavon
District Council's proposal to have the lido site demolished and
incorporated into the park?
Enysford
(Kent)
Are you in favour of the use
of Greenbelt land for Affordable Housing?
Shoram
(Kent)
Do you think that Thomas
Highgate's name should be included on Shoreham war memorial?
Tavistock
(Devon)
1. Do you agree that GM
crops should not be grown in the Tavistock area?
2. Would you like to see
Tavistock Council work proactively toward becoming a GM free
zone?
Horley
(Surrey)
1. Do you agree that
agricultural land in the North East and North West Sectors of
Horley should be developed for housing and/or general
development?
2. Do you agree that the
farmer in the North West Sector of Horley should be evicted from
his farm to make way for housing and/or general development?
Bury
St Edmunds (Suffolk)
Is the basic design of the Cattle Market Shopping Centre, as
submitted by Centros Miller, suitable for Bury St Edmunds?
Quedgeley (Gloucester)
Is there a need for a Parish Council in Quedgeley?
Biddulph (Staffordshire)
Should car parking charges be imposed on the Wharf Road and
Craigside car parks in Biddulph at this time?
East Coker (Somerset)
Do you support the imposition of a moratorium on planning
approvals for the construction of high density housing within
the Sunningdale boundary until such time as amenities for public
education, healthcare, and sewage become adequate for existing
parishioners? |