Exodus (Greek: "departure") is the second book of the Jewish Torah and of the Christian Old Testament. It tells how Moses leads the Israelites out of Egypt and through the wilderness to the Mountain of God (Mount Sinai). There Yahweh gives the Israelites their laws and enters into a covenant with them, giving them the land of Canaan in return for their faithfulness.
Exodus for men is how they were driven out of paradise because of a woman and their long journey in search of the promised land.
----------------------------------------------------
Many of the problems we now face in society are caused by marriage laws that have become grossly unfair to men. The first rule is not to marry.
Women have become selfish and feel entitled to much. They need us now to tell the truth about how we feel about that. If we don't tell them, they will never know that we don't like: their arrogance, selfishness, superficiality, wickedness, dishonesty, lack of compassion and their agressiveness. We insist that silence is the worst policy. They may not like what we are saying, but they might be grateful later.
Another truth about women is that they are not to be trusted, generally. They cheat as much as men, they push for a commitment then become unhappy once they get one, they will soon lose interest in sex with you and might become attracted to someone else, after a time you got the distinct impression that the better you treat them the worst they treat you. This is not only an impression, it is the truth! They need some measure of meanness to keep them in line and appreciate you. So, don't be so nice in the future: it is not appreciated and does you a disservice. Be a little bit mean and rude, so that she knows that you love her! But this is totally illogical! Certainly, but women are illogical creatures.
Do women usually get what they want? First of all, they don't know what they want. Be nice to them and they will blame everything on you, become resentful and angry. They desperately seek marriage, but become unhappy in marriage. They are very apt otherwise at shooting themselves in the foot.
Why are they so mean? Because when you show them kindness, they think that you are an easy target, and when you snarl back and bite them, they realize that they have misjudged you and begin to respect you. But such behaviour befits an animal not a human being, after all they are not animals! Are you sure?
Given these inconsistencies in behaviour, it is quite understandable that men are not willing to commit. Worse, when they learn what women really think of then and how they do strategize with each other to get what they want from them, how they seem to justify anything in their own minds, suddenly, at the sight of the beast, they get afraid and think of protecting themselves.
This has been discussed in many books. However, none has succeeded in explaining the true cause. One phrase can explain it. "The Great Female Deceit". To say it is one thing, to understand it quite another. Women are great at concealing truths about themselves. Men usually don't have a clue because they have been conned into believing what women said, which is that women won't cheat, love unconditionally, etc. Find out what she don't want you to know. It is high time that someone does expose women, relationships, commitment, marriage, and the problems of the Law.
OFFICIAL
LIST OF GRIEVANCES
WHAT REALLY MAKES YOU
ANGRY
It is time that we finally name, confront, and say clearly what we don't like about life in society, regardless of political correctness and the usual restraints of too strict conduct codes. The list is a noble thing, an endeavour to come closer to the truth. Why are we mad at women, angry with our government, dissatisfied with our life and sore at the world ?
1- We don't like feminists and feminism because for more than 50 years they keep saying, when anything bad happens, that it is all men's fault. In fact, we should apologize to them for the simple fact that we exist and breathe.
2- In several countries, when it comes to domestic/marital questions in court, the man is presumed guilty and seen as a potential abuser. No presumption of innocence. He is simply guilty of being a man.
3- According feminist's creeds all men are abusers; all women are victims.
4- In Australia, Canada and the US, any woman can file a complaint and send her husband to prison without any substantial proof. Following an Intervention Order, a man can be removed from his home, possessions, and family largely without recourse.
5- What angers the father and husband nowadays is that he is no longer the head of his family. He is still the provider, but has nothing to say: ''pay and shut up''. If he doesn't do what they say, his wife will file a complaint and his children will go to the police (calling their father an abuser), and he will end up in prison. After the divorce, he must still pay! Two questions:
Why should a man pay for something that he doesn't own? He will pay all his life for a woman that can walk out on him anytime, and for children that can be removed from him at any moment, and that will eventually abandon him anyway. If he is not the boss, if he doesn't own his family, why should he pay for it?
Women still ask men to pay, why? She competes with him in the workplace, steals his job, his money, his family, the government and feminist organizations strip him of his power, take away everything from him, and still the man is expected to pay. Why? She makes much more money than he does, what is she complaining about?
6- How many men worldwide go to prison because of a woman?And they complain that men love them less, even that they begin to hate them. As things stand, they haven't seen anything yet!
7- Widespread
discrimination against men and boys that includes one-sided legislation,
selective enforcement, and neglected civil rights.
Legislation that addresses
women's needs without considering the corresponding need in men. Biases
in the justice system against men, such as longer incarceration rates for
men than women for the same crimes.
Statutory rape laws enforced
more vehemently in instances where the victim is female and/or the perpetrator
is male. Double Standard: The Bias Against Male Victims of Sexual Abuse.
It is more difficult for men to get fair trials.
The Big Lie is to say that
women are disadvantaged in many areas of life and require special provisions.
The situation is now that men are seriously and deliberately disadvantaged
in society. A balance between men's and women's rights and responsibilities
needs to be restored. While various father's and men's groups have demanded
some change since the mid-1970s, no remedy has yet appeared.
8- The societal acceptance of violence harming men paired with the stigma against the violence harming women. Males are being taught or expected to take on violent roles and forced to risk their lives in male-only conscripted military service. But when it concerns the "violence against women", it is seen as more important than other forms of violence (e.g., "never hit a woman/girl") which results in disproportionate penalties to men for similar crimes. There is a media assumption of female innocence and sympathy for women, while men are viewed as agressors. On the other hand, depiction of violence against men is seen as humorous (there is no sympathy for male victims of domestic violence). The fact that more boys are killed by parents than girls each years is not addressed at all.
9- Discrimination
in social- and health services.
Lack of advocacy for men's
rights; more social programs for women than for men
Special government agencies
for women's affairs with no corresponding agencies for men's affairs (women-only
facilities, without any equivalent for men)
There is a lack of legal
ramifications and enforcement for paternity fraud
There is a lack of funding
for men's health; far more money goes to female causes than to male causes
(prostate cancer vs. breast cancer research)
There are limited choices
regarding male contraception.
While circumcision is widespread
and acceptable in infant males, female circumcision is often considered
immoral, if not illegal (the public act of UK parliament - Female Genital
Mutilation Act, and in Canada in the Criminal Code)
Fathers are forced out of their children's lives, and the children become bargaining tools in legal actions. One parent has custody while the other pays the monetary costs. Access to the children is dependent upon the father's ability to pay 'child support' fees. While many families require two incomes for simple survival, families of divorce are expected to maintain two households on a single income. This under threat of jail for nonpayment of 'child support' fees, then fathers are incarcerated at any sign of temporary inability to pay child support.
Discrimination
in Education
There is a lack of educational
aid for boys and men, as a consequence their performance/enrollment at
most levels lags behind that of girls and women. Some countries and states
declare all-male schools illegal, while all-female schools is legal.
Some university Women's
studies departments are more concerned with teaching feminist ideology
than equality of gender. The content and emphasis of these courses contribute
to animosity towards men.
10- Discrimination
in the workplace.
In High-risk employment
men receive no special thank or honor for job well done. On the contrary,
there are harder physical entrance criteria for men in many occupations
- such as the army, police and the fire service. Requiring men to be physically
stronger than women in these occupations leaves men responsible for a greater
share of the physical work, for no more pay.
In all other jobs though
there is a legal inequality and difference in protections when it concerns
the paternal vs. maternal leave.
The sexual harassment issue
has done more to harm morale and cause distrust among co-workers than it
has to uncover improper behavior and punish offenders. Men are suspect
under these company and government policies, which tend to favor women.
An offhand comment or misunderstood gesture can cost a man his job and
ruin his career, and as in other areas like divorce or domestic violence,
a man has little or no recourse in defending himself. This is an issue
where employers have gone overboard in implementing policies, and these
policies are far too often abused for purposes unintended by those who
established them.
If we try to sum it up until now, there is:
A structural oppression of
men (such as male depression, the fact men commit suicide 4 times more
often than women, constitute over 90% of the prison population, a majority
of alcoholics, drug addicts, homeless people, have lower levels of university
attendance and a shorter life expectancy etc.)
Women have a role in- and
responsibility for family or domestic violence.
Family courts discriminate
against men.
Single mother families produce
an increased crime rate and a prevalence of drug abuse in children.
False claims of domestic
violence or child sexual abuse are put forth by women during divorce proceedings.
Mainstream media are dominated
by feminists.
Men are over-worked, trained
to kill or be killed, brutalised and subjected to blame and shame. Not
enough attention is given to the damage, isolation and suffering inflicted
on boys and men through their socialisation into manhood.
The impact of fatherlessness
on men's psychological development and the boys victims of militant feminism
and single motherhood are systematically neglected and underestimated.
The feminist 'industry'
thrives by undermining the nature of heterosexual relationships. For this,
they will support same-sex marriage, getting women out to work, paying
women welfare to encourage relationship break-ups, urging women to feel
abused in some way and to prosecute their partners, to ask for unjustly
high alimony payouts, demonising and mocking men, and forever encouraging
lesbianism. They will disempower men within those relationships as much
as possible and ensure that when the break up occurs, they will lose out
the most.
As we see, laws and conventions intended to encourage equal rights for women have evolved into function as special privileges without responsibility and an elevated status for women only. This has resulted in serious harm to the family structure, education, social services programs, as well as a negative impact on women themselves. Men start to hate women because of this.
A
LIST OF WANTS
A NEW LIST OF GRIEVANCES
A new list of grievances is needed, a list of all things that are lacking in men and need urgently changing. It would be perhaps more appropriate though to call it a list of wants.
1. As men we ought to be building more support for other men and act brotherly towards them.
2. We ought to be confronting male violence towards men and boys and see how we are socialized by women to injure and kill each other.
3. As men we ought to be confronting how we are the fodder for Wars - how Older Men send Younger Men to be killed for no good purpose.
4. We ought to confront the fact that we die at higher rates from birth on and that the rates get worse as we get older and in that sense we clearly are the "sacrificed gender",
5. As men we ought to confront the types of pressures that other men put on us to conform - to be "real men" in many ways. Women force such Men to threaten us in this manner.
6- Being Male is hazardous to our Health! While individual women may hurt us, institutionalized Misandry is a much stronger force in our lives most of the time. The only way to better ourselves and make our own lives happier and safer would be to finally confront this evil of misandry and get rid of feminism for good. Fellow male of this earth, unite!
7- Listening, learning and growing as Men, building a "men's space" that isn't oppressive, that is the solution for the future. We should see other men as allies and brothers.
8- Sadly enough, some will betray us and eventually sell out to feminism. What should we do with those traitors? We don't advocate here termination with extreme prejudice, but it might become necessary.
9- Finally we should not tolerate anymore that men be routinely pilloried because they're men. The values of democracy include the belief that all humans are created equal, that collective guilt or punishment is unfair, and that there should be a freedom of expression. With the advent of misandry - viewing men as villains and oppressors - these values are on the way of disappearing completely.
Some day the oppressed males will rise and revolt. Keep the faith brothers, keep the hope! Remember that God is a man and that he is on our side. Some day, such feminist evil and ugliness will be defeated and an earthly paradise restored.
Just remember brother that THEY WILL PAY and YOU WILL GET YOUR REVENGE some day. This might be enough to help you through this day. Remember this famous quote from the Galaxy Quest mission: <<By Grabtar's hammer, by the sons of Worvan YOU SHALL BE AVENGED>> and as far as feminists are concerned <<Never give up, never surrender!>> Take care!
DO THEY BRING HAPPINESS?
In the classic Hollywood movie, the hero fights hard, wins and gets the girl at the end. They marry, have children and live happily ever after. Now, if victory and achievements could undoubtedly bring some measure of happiness, we're not so sure about the girl. According to the Hollywood philosophy, getting the woman of your dreams is the necessary condition to attain happiness, but what we witness in daily life is more like thousands of men having their life ruined by a woman. So, let's ask the forbidden question if we dare! Do you have the stomach for it gentlemen? Brace yourself, this question will shake you to the core? Here goes: DO WOMEN BRING HAPPINESS TO MEN?
If it is true that love hurts, then love is not good. If it is true that the end of a marriage or relationship brings sorrow, then relationships are not good. There is no way around it, let's be true and fair, and realistic: love and relationships are women's inventions and women's tools, and if they are not good (like it becomes apparent every day), then women themselves are not good and useless to us in our search of true happiness. In our quest for happiness, women should not even be considered a tool or factor. Far from being an asset, they are a hindrance. They really should be banned from the civilized society of men.
What led us to believe that we needed them in the past? Sex or more precisely our sex drive. If we consider the price we pay for these little orgasms, women are clearly a luxury we can't afford. Anyway, sex like infatuation never lasts, and the cornerstone for love and happiness is precisely duration. So, if it doesn't last, it is neither love nor happiness. There is no doubt that without their sex drive, men would find women much less interesting and attractive. If they are a hindrance, sex drive proper could be seen as an obstacle on the path to wisdom and true spirituality, but until now a necessary one, then it was always this way that we reproduced.
The purpose of life may have been fulfillment of duty and service to country or fellow man in the past, but there is a tendency in modern times to consider personal happiness as the goal. Clearly, if happiness is meant as a state of balance, peace and tranquility, women do not belong in it. They are rather disturbers of the peace, that can bring only trouble and sorrow. Harmony would be quickly destroyed by them if we allowed them in, so they must be banished and kept outside of our paradise.
Some may protest and say that men and women belong to the same species: the human race, that they belong together. However, modern development leading to the gender war indicates otherwise. They have moved so much apart, that it is not sure anymore if they still belong to the same race. In fact, having a good look at them these days, one could easily say that women belong to another race.
EXPLOITATION OF THE MALE SEX DRIVE
Prostitution, pornography, the so-called sex industry is not the exploitation of women as sexual objects, on the contrary it is in fact the economic exploitation of the male. So why do we continue to view women as victims? Upbringing, feminist propaganda, or this exaggerated respect for them that we have inherited from the past and from history?
Who is the victim clearly means who is the client, who pays? Overwhelmingly, it is the male; so he is the real victim. And what will he get for his money? Not much. In most Western countries he runs risks, and that is mainly what he will get.
1- He will pay the prostitute
so she can give him a venereal disease (often deadly)
2- He runs the risk of being
arrested by undercover policewomen
3- He runs further risks
of being robbed of his wallet and money if he falls asleep afterwards
4- He could be blackmailed
later
5- And if it becomes known
that he went to a prostitute, his reputation will be damaged.
So, the next time a prostitute
offers you her services, tell her how good a deal this is:
''I will pay you to get
a disease, run the risk of being arrested, robbed and blackmailed, and
have my reputation ruined'', ''What a great offer! No, thanks''.
--------------------------------------------
One more proof that the so-called sex industry is not the exploitation of women as sexual objects, but in fact the economic exploitation of the male: the strip-tease, the so-called strip-dancers or strippers. One woman is dancing and showing the parts of her body that will bring her money. Men are giving their money. Who is the victim and who's the predator? The audience of men is the victim. It is them who are exploited economically. Who profits from this? Clearly the dancer.
1- Men are forced to give her their money because of peer pressure.
2- They are led to believe that she dances for them because she likes them.
3- In fact, she dances only for the money. She hates them and despises them.
4- Every man in the audience thinks that she dances only for him, which is false.
5- And finally, when she finishes her dance 200 men are aroused, and she can only go to bed with one (if she ever does). So 199 men are cheated. A woman's erotic dance is the biggest lie on earth: it is the shameless exploitation of the male sex drive for money. And if women are doing that for money, they are revealing thereby what they love most and hold dear. It is not men, children, family and the rest that they love, the true love of their life is money. Men ought to remember that.
There are similarities with marriage here: you pay a person to make you unhappy and give her the means to hurt you for life. And if you have children? You pay to get mortal enemies in twenty years. In both cases, you are the victim. So, are marriage and fatherhood dangerous? Very, why do you think James Bond, the very one who took pride in all his life for living dangerously, never got the stomach to marry? He was afraid, that's why.
TIMING IS EVERYTHING
She sends him the bad news by messenger precisely on the date of an important anniversary. The divorce papers arrive at the most inopportune time, the subpoena is served when he is with the children, are these mere coincidence? Of course not, she planned for this for a long time. Let's equate such sick feminine planning with a battle plan or war strategy: she wants to do the most damage and she will succeed, unless...
Unless we see that most women are sick, unless we prepare for the next cruelty, unless we recognize that their only worth is reproduction... We have always said on this board that if we find a way to reproduce and get sexual satisfaction without them, women are no more needed on this earth. Solve both problems (sex and reproduction) and the feminist empire will crumble like a house of cards. No doubt that female androids and the mastery of cloning will be their undoing in the long run; the unthinkable could even become possible: a male empire (a one sex only, one gender world).
WHAT A LOSER, SHE SAID
<<What a loser!>>, she said, discarding him as insignificant. Who is she to make such judgments and why in hell should he be absolutely a winner? The question we should ask here is what is to be gained by being perceived as a winner by the fair(?) sex, what benefits do we get by having the other side think positively of us? A woman's smile or praise, even if she is strikingly beautiful, does not bring much to a man. It does not make him wealthier, happier or generally improve things in his life; at most it will fleetingly flatter his ego and make him proud for a few seconds: not worth mentioning or spending much time to prepare for such petty triumphs! In truth, women's opinion and women's praise have little or no value.
And what exactly is a winner in her conception? Being a parasite, as most women are, she expects him to be athletic (the captain of the football team), the most popular student, a great dancer with a great job and a bright future, who makes a lot of money of course and brings her in all the hottest and most expensive shows and restaurants, and travels to exotic places. She already reckons what the marriage will bring in for her: a position in social life, a townhouse, at least three cars, a palace in the country and of course a villa in Monaco, on the Riviera, and why not a yacht 70 feet long!
And what does she do to deserve all that? Well, she's beautiful and she is a woman. Is that all? Because she's got a cute face and a nice body, plump in all the right places (butt, breasts and tits), because of that we should give her the world? Seems hardly fair! Beauty, especially women's beauty is highly overrated. Beautiful is not necessary useful, as we most often find out in ordinary life. In fact, most pretty things are useless, and women do fall in that category. Letting a decoration rule your life and declare that you are a loser is a bad idea. In fact, thinking of her as a decoration could be most helpful in that regard. Who cares about the opinion of a knickknack? Then it is exactly what she is: a Christmas tree decoration!
WHO RULES THE WORLD
Women rule this world. Many suggest and believe that the world is ruled by men, and designed for men. Where decisions are mainly made by males in the parliament house, and where the father of the family is the most honored. This is clearly not the case. This world is in fact a woman's world, where women acquire all benefits.
Five points illustrate this:
1- Baldness. Women almost never go bald, not even if they are over ninety years old! On contrary, 96% of all men over sixty years old suffer from baldness! And some will even turn bald before the age of 30. It is hard to find wigs for men, and most men wouldn't spend money buying one. Women will never need to shop for wigs, and will never risk catching baldness sunburn! Or the skin cancer that goes with it.
2- Upbringing. Men are brought up to become Gentlemen, to serve ladies. They are taught not to hit girls, slap girls, call them names and spit at them. They are told "No, don't poke your sister", "Act like a big brother and stand up for your sister". It is also demanded to open doors for the ladies and always let them through the door first. The interesting thing is that there is hardly any ladies left on the planet. Ladies were supposed to be polite and never swear. Still, we have to look after them nonetheless.
3- Men are expected to be tough. They are not allowed to do a number of things. For example to cry. They have to repress human emotions and act tough, while women can cry whenever they feel like it. Toughness leads men to be in the frontline when a war starts, while women comfortably wait at the rear! During the battle men will risk their life to save such women sitting at home and may disobey orders to do this, while no woman would ever risk her life to save a man.
4- Children. After a separation, the woman always gets the children. Men may love their children too, but they can't have them. A woman and a mother has unconditional priority when it comes to children. The man has the sole right to pay her alimony for the rest of his life.
5- Work. Women argue that the advantage of men is that they go to work. They have to stay at home. But 'Who doesn't want to stay home?' A man has to support his whole family by working everyday, not even liking his job. He has no choice. Working every day is boring, aging and very bad for you. Why do you think women prefer to stay home?
The truth is that men have a hard life and are far from ruling the world now. Who wants to work endlessly and fight wars? Let the women work and do the fighting for a change! We need a period of rest. Let them carry the burden while we enjoy ourselves. You want liberation ladies, you want your freedom? Here is the work, feel free to do it!
As the Germans put it on top of the doors of concentration camps: Arbeit macht frei (to work liberates you). Happy liberation ladies!
THEY ARE NOT SO BEAUTIFUL
Remove the sexy clothes, remove the silk and you will see: they are not so beautiful at all! The most beautiful woman in the world has hairs in many part of her body not just on the top of her head. While Hollywood is selling a hairy and rugged man as opposed to a soft and hairless woman, this is far from the reality, then women too have body hairs. Most women are not so attractive when they stand naked, that is why they prefer to lie down or put something on when they get up. The clothes industry is there for only one reason as far as women are concerned: to enhance their failing attraction powers. For women, clothes are not mere protection, they enhance their natural beauty. But if their beauty needs enhancing, that beauty is not so great after all!
All the cosmetic and perfume industry, all the clothes and sexy garments are there for only one reason: a woman, any woman in her natural condition and natural habitat does not look and smell that good. She looks great in that bikini! OK, remove the bikini and picture her naked, does she look that great anymore? If not, my friend, you were in love with the bikini. Remove all the beauty products and have a good look at her standing naked in front of you, are you still attracted to her and is she still that beautiful? In most cases, she is not anymore. The outer decorative shell is gone, what you have in front of you is a female specimen of the human species. She is not ugly, no one says here that she is ugly, but she is in no way more beautiful than you are: in no way superior, more important or prettier than any male. You as a male should be happy, then we just discarded a myth: the myth of the eternal feminine beauty. Nothing is eternal and feminine is not necessary synonymous with beautiful.
We are not suggesting here that there are no beautiful women in this world, but remove all beauty products and her beauty is still there, but much less striking. It should then be easier to debunk the myth that beautiful people are good. Physical beauty has nothing to do with the goodness of the heart, as most people experienced. There are good looking people that are nasty and cruel, and more often than not beauty means arrogance, a bigger ego, insensitivity and a general lack of compassion. While a person with a lack of physical beauty bordering on ugliness like Mother Theresa may be the epitome of human goodness, beautiful actresses on the other hand show their nasty side daily. In fact, beauty has been so overrated in the last two centuries that many are tired of it. Some may go as far as saying that it has no value.
IF THEY CAN'T HAVE IT, THEY WILL DESTROY IT
Who will destroy what, if they can't have it? Men probably, they are depicted as the violent gender. Dead wrong this time, then we are talking about WOMEN: the evil gender! It first occured to me when someone mentioned a government funded family plan where a woman need not to resort to an abortion: she could give birth to the child and if she didn't have the means to support it, it would be given to adoption. A woman I know objected that she wouldn't go along with that and that no other woman would. Asked why, she replied: <<if I can't keep it, I prefer to have it killed>>.
Something similar is happening with J.K.Rowling, the author of Harry Potter. To keep control of her invented character Harry Potter, she decided to possibly kill it in the last novel but she changed her mind in the last minute. She didn't want that after her death, someone else writes about Harry Potter and continues the story.
Now this is a typical feminine trait: if I can't have it or keep it, I prefer to kill it. And they are talking about love! Constantly. They obviously don't know that to truly love a person or character is to be ready to let him or her go, not to force them but to love them, even if they are taken from you or abandon you. But women are so selfish as to be simply totally incapable of such a caring act.
PURITY AND WAR CRIMES
Most people are under the impression that women and children (especially little girls) are more pure than grown-up men. This is a myth that urgently needs debunking, since the feminist movement uses such beliefs as arguments and weapons in its war against men.
What is purity? To have no evil intention, to be quiet, peaceful, full of TLC (tender loving care), that is what little girls are expected to be: cute, beautiful, quiet, understanding, loving. Especially the quiet aspect is emphasized, leading to this supreme feminine quality: the intimacy. Boys are branded as restless and brutes, while this quiet thing about girls makes them special, superior, peace loving, perfect!
Let's see. This feminine obsession with intimacy and quietness leading to the unmistakable writing of her private diary reveals quite other things about girls: hypocrisy, narcissism, lies, secret desires, plots, conspiracies, hiding the truth permanently and retreating to a private world (irresponsibility) and above all: selfishness. The pretended purity of little girls comes awfully close to a permanent state of selfishness that will produce these wonderful specimens of Jewish American Princesses that infest the American continent today.
As for tender loving care and peace loving, have you ever seen a woman in a fit of rage because she cannot get what she wants? Frightful, when her selfish desires and demands are not met, all the ugliness that was in her suddenly comes out and her true nature is revealed. Where has all the purity gone? It was probably never there. By the way, if Narcissus was a man in Greek mythology (a handsome youth) who falls in love with his own reflection in a pool of water, the real Narcissus in modern times are women. Who spends most of its time looking into the mirror?
The character trait of exaggerated self love is incompatible with true purity, so stop this charade about girls' purity, they don't even know the meaning of the word. Looking at them, it is more uncleanliness of the heart that comes to mind! In psychology and psychiatry, excessive narcissism is recognized as a severe personality dysfunction or personality disorder. The Narcissistic Personality Disorder, that's what girls are really about. It has nothing to do with purity.
While men and women are supposed to be considered "equal" under the law, the days of the Titanic in 1912 and the assumed expendability of the male passengers are not over. They are still in force when it comes to Maritime law. When a ship sinks nowadays, we can still hear the dreaded "women and children first" slogan announced over the PA. Men are not allowed to disembark before all women had been saved. But why should women always get the lifeboats and men should always get the icy waters and have to swim hundreds of yards. Why in hell should we sacrifice our lives for such selfish shallow nonentities as the likes of women? Because they are pure? We know they are not. Because they carry children? Children are no more important than grown-up men. Children and youth for that matter are only a potentiality, they are certainly not more important. The child, in most cases, will become an average human being doing an ordinary job. Not a genius.
Next time around, do not sacrifice your life for the royal sex, grab a life jacket and get into that boat. If another man interferes and wants you to sacrifice your life and defend the royal sex, to kill that man or anyone that stands between you and safety could be considered an act of self-defense. We do not advise you to do it, but we understand. If you do, you are forgiven.
As a last remark, let us remind you that most crimes committed against men (hate, violence, betrayal) are done by women, not some crazy dictator. So, with the advent of the gender war, they have become now THE WORST WAR CRIMINALS IN HISTORY.
HIDING BEHIND THE CHILDREN
Women believe themselves to be so important! They believe that they and their children are a family, that even in the absence of the father they constitute the society. But such truncated one parent only families do not constitute a very strong human fabric for a society. They are more the symptom of a serious societal sickness. A woman and her children amount to little in the economy, they consume lots of goods and services but produce nothing. In fact, there is something parasitical about women and these children. While women insist that their children are the future of the country, we know very well that they are a mere potentiality that will take at least 20 years to develop (an awful long time), and even when they come to fruition, it is not clear if they will pay off all the investment.
While men are discarded as insignificant by women, they constitute the very backbone of the economy. But the backbone is not strong anymore, under the repeated attacks of feminists it weakens and becomes sick. Millions of isolated men are now asking themselves the question: why should I continue to work to sustain a family that made me an outcast in the first place? Such depressed men do not want to continue anymore, they payed the bills and the bulk of the taxes for a long time, but they are now tired of being the backbone of a sick society in urgent need of chiropractic treatments.
The reason why women cling to their children like that is because without them, they are nothing! THEY ARE HIDING BEHIND THE CHILDREN to forget their own uselessness and powerlessness. Only one example will make this clear: the beggars and the act of begging. An old baggar sits at the street corner. Nobody notices him, nobody will give him any money. A young man this time begs for money: same result, nobody cares. Now there comes a woman with her two children and sits on the same spot. It doesn't take long this time before somebody stops and asks her what she is doing there, gives her some money and offers to help right away. The above example does not merely shows how the genders are treated differently by society, it does show much more what happens when one has the alibi of children with her. The next time you meet an arrogant feminist, so proud of her motherhood and femininity, just ask her: ARE YOUR CHILDREN YOUR ALIBI AND DO YOU HIDE BEHIND THEM?
THE GOOD SIDE
AND NOW, we declare ourselves to be the source of all that is good and righteous in the world, and the enemy is the source of all evil. Any mistake, any problem, is the fault of the enemy, an act of deliberate malice against us; the enemy is a perversion of humanity, it is the denial of that shining light of humanity which we alone represent. The complexities of life are thus reduced to one simple issue: the just, true, necessary, holy crusade against the evil of the enemy - for only when the enemy is defeated will the good triumph, and heaven on earth will come to pass.
The subhuman evil of femaleness is the true enemy of humanity. Feminists are aggressors, atheists, barbarians, liars, feelingless, automatons, sadists and greedy, beastly, death-oriented and conspiratorial. Their actions are grounded in deliberate malice.
The 'war of the sexes' could be described as the struggle of malicious women against blameless men. Women are involved and in many ways responsible for the evils of this world. The greatest problem we face is that self-styled 'feminism' has been busy teaching women to hate for decades. Most women are therefore irrecoverable.
The hostility of women towards men - and towards each other - is very real. A brief glance at any 'women's magazine' provides any number of gleeful descriptions of jealousy, revenge and spite, often praised and rewarded as 'sensible' behaviour. But it's not sensible at all. It's dependent on disempowerment of 'the other' to provide the illusion of power: in reality it eats away at the soul...
Hatred and the desire for revenge are human traits, and they're more developed in one gender: women. Describing hostile women, we come closer to the 'faces of the enemy'. It is no coincidence that we assign 'good' human traits to 'the righteous', and 'bad' human traits to 'the enemy'. It is the reality.
Feminists point out that throughout the Middle Ages churchmen and others blamed women for all the world's ills. There must have been a reason for this. They say that blame is dispowerful and addictive, that it easily escalates into hatred. But blame is assigned for a reason. If it takes real power to stop it... , there must be an original cause for the blame. Groundless accusations are a rare occurence indeed in this world, we all know that usually the ones blamed are guilty of something.
Men are naturally violent;
women are naturally deceitful
Men create; women destroy
Men co-operate (team sports)
and compete; women deceive and manipulate
Men are truly sensitive
and empathic; women show sensitivity to mask their selfishness
Men dominate and share power;
women manipulate and ask for more power
Women are the problem; men
are the solution.
The so-called religious-fundamentalist assertion that "women are the problem, and men are the solution" is in fact right. Truth can break down the barriers between women and men. Women have only to accept how wrong they were, apologize and ask for forgiveness. There is only a small chance that they ever do that however, then it would take an increase in honesty and a diminished ego.
There is no symmetry between the genders, only a reversed symmetry. Masculism is not complementary to feminism, since lies cannot go hand in hand with the truth. They evolve in different realms. Granted the 'good' and the 'bad' walk on the same earth, but they come from two different places. Both sexes may have their validity and their problem areas, but the masculine has more validity (we must absolutely believe this if we want to win). Masculism is far more than a backlash against feminism; and feminism is no more than the thuggery of the 'feminazis'. It is quite clear then: no symmetry!
Although self-styled feminists may rail against the shortcomings of 'patriarchy', we cannot assume that a 'matriarchy' would be any better. It would no doubt be much worse. We cannot say that women, being human, share exactly the same traits as men and that it becomes all too clear in the practice of politics. No, they do not share the same traits as men, since they are definitely much worse.
Word-pairs do not show a real gender symmetry: for instance 'maternal' and 'paternal' do not indicate somewhat different forms of nurturing, then one is real and the other is for show only. One can oftentimes become an intrusive, interested and selfish overprotectiveness. We need to acknowledge women's less-than-'nice' behaviour by recognizing that 'motherhood' and 'motherly' as synonymous of goodness and nurturing can be misleading and a sham, and that most of the time they are. Some of the words that we'd need for gender symmetry don't exist, simply because there is no such symmetry.
For example, we know how annoying it is to be 'patronised': so what is it to be 'matronised'? We know what the patronising behaviour of the classic chauvinist looks like; so surely we would describe the arrogant 'mother knows best' attitude as being equally 'matronising'? But there is no such thing. Patronizing is at least straightforward, while the tools of femininity are deceit and lies, which implies concealment. To be matronised would be to be poisoned or lied to. So as we see: two diferent languages and realities, two different powers and realms. There may be some similarities, but no symmetry.
We know what a 'patriot' is: what, then, is a 'matriot'? One who fights for the Motherland - such as Mother Russia, or Mother Nature - much as a patriot might be fighting for the Fatherland? But there is no such thing as mother nature. Nature is generous, women are selfish. Women like things and modern comfort, they like to buy things in shopping centres. So, they ask men to rape the earth to extract the minerals to build them things, things that they will buy in shopping centres. Therefore, women are no friends of the environment, they may be said to be at the origin of modern pollution and environment disasters. It is their greed that produced all that. It may be said that women's greed produced global warming and will eventually destroy this earth. There is then absolutely no symmetry here.
The unpleasant counterpart to misogyny is 'misandry' - a despising, or even a hatred, of men. Apart from the fact that modern misogyny may be a reaction to half a century of 'misandry', there may be real power coming from valid anger. Not every man who's angry at women is a misogynist though. Many were forced into that position by external events over which they have no control. Their grievances may well be valid, but their anger needs to be focused into a form of constructive empowerment for all the gender.
Feminism may have had some validity in the beginning as 'women fighting for the rights of women seeking to express themselves', but it has evolved into a dishonest blaming of 'the enemy'; whereas the term 'masculist' was being used to describe the behaviour of someone trying to retain power-over others. When self-styled 'feminists' fight for the rights of women against men, it is not feminism anymore. It is rather an attempt to disempower the other side, not to express oneself.
In the last 50 years, the
women we knew, respected, loved, suddenly became angry, vicious, insanely
self-centred - all those things which they had accused men alone of being.
All it did was to produce an entire generation of angry, confused women
and much-abused men. What is surprising is just how powerful those men
have been, given the amount of abuse they took before they cracked...,
but they have cracked. And now they have become just as angry but perhaps
less confused than the enemy, then they have an already powerful masculist
movement to rely on.
