What has us so upset?

Note: This article is now several years old, and has not been updated.

This "long rant," as a reader on Slashdot put it, used to be on the home page. We have decided to make a simpler home page, and move the long piece here.

The recording industry has created new copy protected discs that will not play in a computer. They have also shut down the file trading service, Napster, and seek to stop all online file trading. These actions violate our rights.  In addition to these things, the retail price of compact discs continues to skyrocket as the cost to manufacture discs comes down. We urge all consumers to refrain from purchasing compact discs to punish the recording industry for their actions.

New discs with copy protection schemes are intended to prevent the music on them from being offered to users of file trading web sites. To achieve this end, the discs will not play in a computer. Frequently, these discs will not play in a DVD player, a car stereo, or an older CD player either. This keeps us from listening to music we paid for when and where we want to. Take for example, a commuter on a bus or a subway train. This commuter puts a new CD by his or her favorite artist into a laptop, and it won't play! This is a direct violation of our personal property rights. We have the right to use our personal property, such as a disc we paid for, as we choose to. It is also not possible to make a custom mix of favorite songs from personally owned CDs, or to copy them to a personal MP3 player when these protection schemes are used without extreme difficulty. This violates our right to fair use of copyrighted materials. 

Many of us use our computers as our only CD player. If a disc will not play in a computer, It is useless, especially to the aforementioned commuter. It is certainly not worth paying up to twenty dollars for something it cost them under one dollar to manufacture. An example of these frequently unplayable discs is Charley Pride - A Tribute to Jim Reeves published by Music City Records. It is encoded with a protection scheme called mediacloq made by Sunncomm. In addition Music City Records, Sunncomm's website lists BMG, Fahrenheit Records, and Sunbird Records as their customers. Celine Dion's CD, A New Day Has Come causes computers to crash. It also has permanently damaged some CD-Rom drives by corrupting their firmware. If this disc is placed in a Macintosh Computer, it cannot be removed without the help of a professional service technician. This disc published by Epic/Sony contains a protection scheme called Key2Audio. Another copy protection scheme is called Cactus Data Shield. It was made by Midbar Tech, which was recently acquired by Macrovision Corporation. 

There are ways to get around these protections, but they are illegal, thanks to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a bad law paid for by corporate lobbyists that severely limits free speech and virtually eliminates fair use.  Among other things, the DMCA makes circumvention of copy protection illegal. It makes no exceptions for fair use, research, or any other reason. The DMCA is trampling over free speech and freedom of the press. Thanks to this law, a Russian programmer named Dmitry Sklyarov was imprisoned for giving a speech at a conference. He works for a company called ElcomSoft, who developed a program to allow an Adobe Ebook to be backed up, or read aloud to the blind. This constituted circumvention, a new crime created by the DMCA. All Dmitry did was talk about this software package. There are many other examples too numerous to list here of how freedom of speech and freedom of the press have been curtailed. Go to the links page to read more about the harm this law has done.

File trading is fair use. As long as file traders are not selling the tracks they rip from their own CDs, or selling burned copies of their CDs, they are not pirates.
File trading gives artists, and the recording industry free promotion.  While Napster was online, CD sales were up. Artists like Metallica's Lars Ulrich, and rapper Dr. Dre, who claimed that they were being robbed by Napster did not realize that they were being given a gift. They got more exposure than radio or any other promotion could buy, free of charge, and their new fans who discovered them online did purchase CDs. Calling their fans thieves cost them. They have a lot fewer people purchasing their recordings now. They forgot that fans are the difference between a successful artist and a starving artist. 

File trading gives us a chance to try before we buy. This is something record stores no longer do. It trading gives us access to rare and out of print music we cannot find elsewhere. File trading, like calling in requests to radio stations in the past, gives us the songs we want to hear on demand. Since radio today is dominated by giant conglomerates like Clear Channel, and does not deviate from its very limited play lists, we the music fans need file trading, and so does the music industry. 

It is important that we remind our legislators that they are the servants of the people, not tools for the corporations. Some of them may have only misunderstood the issues, but others are at the beck and call of corporate donors. It was they who passed the DMCA, and took copyright law way beyond its original intent at the behest of the recording industry and Hollywood. We need to write to them, (see links page) and let them know what we, the people think. When they won't listen, we can vote them out of office.

One Senator who has made it clear that he is a tool of the corporations is Ernest "Fritz" Hollings (D) of South Carolina. He has been dubbed, "The Senator from Disney." His Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA), co-sponsored by Alaska's Ted Stevens (R), would go much further than the DMCA in violating our rights. It would force electronics and computer manufacturers to build copy protection into everything they make including, but not limited to, TVs, VCRs, CD players, DVD players, radios, and anything else that can play any kind of media. Go to our links page to read the Electronic Frontier Foundation's letter to these two Senators about the SSSCA. Initial reaction to this bill was so negative, that he has changed its name, hoping to slip it past. It is now the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act (CBDTPA ). Its positive sounding name is a deliberate attempt to fool his fellow Senators. Hollywood lobbyists are also trying to get the house to take up this odious proposal

Not all legislators have sold out to the corporations. An example of  one who has not sold out is Representative Rick Boucher(D) of Virginia, a consumer advocate who supports fair use. We invite everyone to read the article he wrote for news.com, and an article about legislation he has proposed to protect fair use.

A few people have expressed concern that this boycott may harm labels and artists unaffiliated with the RIAA, who do not engage in these practices, and find them as objectionable as we do. Any independent artists and independent labels who wish to be exempt from this boycott may send a pledge that they do not, and will not engage in the practices listed above. We will print it on our reader comments page. Send all correspondence to:

To sum it all up, the recording industry needs to reform itself. Our boycott will end when they meet these demands.

Home